Jump to content

dsaffdg

Members
  • Content Count

    1,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About dsaffdg

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. That's a whole lotta stuff on your wrist. What color is the bezel, can't tell if you have gone sepia filter on that pic or if it's true color? I say it works you for, go for it.
  2. Whatever you do, don't sell the Sub. Maybe see the BB and Pelagos in person at an AD before you make your decision on which one to get. Don't get me wrong, Pelagos is a nice looking watch. But, I always liked the BB's snowflake hands which are in yellow gold (the red version). So, my decision will also be bias in favor of the Bay..
  3. Waikeekee. .thanks for the pics. I guess with 3 adjustments left...I should be fine. Could I trouble you to measure both pieces of the strap?
  4. The watch vendor is correct. The 14060M never got the upgrade to the blue Chromalight
  5. My 2002 Honda civic Type -R
  6. Correction- I removed the bracelet and in between the 12 o'clock lugs it says "REGISTERED DESIGN" 6694 Between the 6 o'clock lugs it says "STAINLESS STEEL" 3440227 My apologies
  7. I like the black with red racing stripe. I think it complements the Pelagos well. Does it feel top heavy on a nato?
  8. Great pick. I wish I could have one of these! Great photos too. Can't wait to hear about the accuracy.
  9. That's a nice legible design, but it reminds me more of a Damasko or Sinn than it does an Explorer...
  10. Looks amazing. I can't wait to test the movement.
  11. wouldnt say either way it should be your choice and no one elses
  12. Went to an AD last Friday to compare two pieces that I have been fantasizing over for a little while. I was hoping to compare the 500107 Portuguese Automatic (with blue hands, numerals and croc strap) to the GO Senator Observer with croc strap. The AD did not have the 07 Portuguese in stock, so I ended up using a similar model with golden hands and numerals instead, for comparison purposes. To me, these two watches are very similar, in that they are both interpretations of the same design theme (i.e., "observatory" or "deck" watches), both from highly reputable brands (with a slight exclusivity edge to GO, given their more labor-intensive production processes and smaller annual production). Wanted to get your thoughts on the pros and cons for both, and I have posted below my impressions of both models, trying to make my mind up. Attachment 2069730 Size-wise, the two are much more similar than their 42 mm (IWC) vs 44 mm (GO) would suggest. The GO, despite being a tad bigger at 44 mm, has slightly shorter lugs than the IWC, so the two fit about the same on my wrist, perhaps with a very slight advantage to the GO even. The bezel on the GO is a bit thicker, but overall dial dimensions are very similar, at least at regular viewing distances, with the IWC looking slightly larger. One thing that is clear: from the back, the IWC 50011 movement fills the case better than the GO Caliber 100-14, which looks positively puny in comparison. The fit and finish is superior on the GO, but the detailing is more microscopic, whereas everything is much more plain to see, more "in your face" with the IWC. Another difference, which I did not expect, is a rather hefty price difference between the two, at least at retail: the GO retails for CDN$10,800, while the IWC retails for almost $14,000, a whopping $3K difference. I have to say I was surprised by this, as these two watches go very much head-to-head in my view, in terms of quality, brand pedigree, etc., where the strengths and weaknesses of each brand offset those of the other. Overall, I find it very difficult to choose between the two (and I would need to take a better look at the 500107 (blue) IWC before making a final choice. GO Observer: Pros: well balanced, refined, tasteful and understated expression of a classic design. Beautiful off-white dial, best "big date" in the business, beautifully shaped and perfectly tinted blued hands, exquisite fit and finish, overall refinement, excellent value/price ratio. Cons: small movement, elements of finish more difficult to appreciate given tiny size of movement/parts, not so "special" movement by GO standards, slightly more austere design (dressier and not as versatile?), dial comparatively a bit smaller with shiny bezel that may be prone to scratches, smaller power reserve, inset pusher for date correction. IWC Portuguese: Pros: Clearer (huge!) dial with more pop and beautiful snailing on the subdials, arguably better dial/subdials proportions, 7-day reserve, slow-beat movement, beautiful (gigantic!) movement that fills the case perfectly, a tad sportier (more versatile?), date adjustment via the crown Cons: More exhuberant design is not as dressy (could be a plus for some), thicker case/bulkier watch despite smaller diameter, hands more bland than the GO's, fit and finish of movement more pedestrian by a small margin, hard-to-justify price 30% price difference, blue colour of indices/hands more "in your face" than the GO's (at least based on pictures). It is hard to imagine anyone being disappointed with any of those two watches. At the same price, I still can't pick a favorite, as they are both similar yet different in certain important areas at the same time. Surprisingly, as much as I've lusted for a Portuguese, I found myself drawn to the GO time and again, despite it being a bit more "plain". I guess that's where the GO's magic lies: it manages to play all the right notes without being overly "loud" about it. It does everything in a very restrained, tasteful manner, with elegance and flair, and flawless execution. Given the significant price gap, I think the choice may have made itself, however. Do the experts around here no how much these respective pieces go for a regular "street" prices from preferred ADs or preferred vendors? I understand that this is the IWC forum, so I would expect people to favor the Portuguese over the GO, but I was wondering if anyone would have insight as to the reasons why one might chose the IWC over the GO in spite of the significant price difference?
  13. hi gang! recently my uncle gave me his GST chrono and i'm baffled as i don't see too many equipped or should i say not equipped with the extra bezel trim ring like this one. it's a 3707 model and from very early 1990's or late 1980's as he can;t seem to remember when he bought it, but bought it new in a beverly hills watch store. with a quick search on the net most seem to have an extra trim ring surrounding the fixed ring around the crystal. i asked him about this and he says this is exactly how he got the watch brand new and has not damaged the watch or lost the ring. i'm wondering if perhaps this is some early model before the bezel trim ring was added? here is a few pics of the watch... here is an example of an all original 18k version of the same model that also does not have the extra bezel trim ring. however, here is the same model i have that a friend of mine owns and his does have the extra bezel trim ring. has anyone else come across similar 3707 model gst chronos that simply had the fixed crystal ring without the extra pressed on bezel trim? none of my fellow watch collectors seem to think my watch looks as if it is missing any trim so i'm wondering if certain early models came this way or perhaps the IWC retailer in beverly hills years ago just happened to have a few oddball examples? i remember reading of a fellow member here who had the same 3707 model i have and reported that his bezel trim ring was lost so he had iwc restore the watch and install a new ring. had it serviced. he had posted before and after pics of his watch but i can't seem to find the thread. i wonder if i'm just being too anal as the ring is not needed to retain the crystal as it already has a fixed ring, and should just wear it and forget it? do any fellow members here have similar model gst chronos and can comment on my example and post some pics of theirs for comparison? thanks in advance for any comments and hope everyone enjoys the upcoming holiday season! janice cebu city philippines :)
×
×
  • Create New...