I recently want to buy an orange Seamaster, I had tried 8500 and 9300 in an exclusive shop, but for the different movement, they have $3300 gap in price with an unengaging discount. Though the Cal.9300 is beautiful, it priced too high that amount to a Rolex price. So, I'm here to ask for some advices, thanks!
8500 OR 9300!
#2
Posted 27 September 2014 - 08:03 AM
Due to the complexity of these movements, it's normally that Cal.9300 chronometer priced higher (the price gap is about $1980). It might not appropriate to comare with Rolex in price, they are two different brands. I have owned a Rolex Daytona, but I later bought a PO 9300 for instead because this watch is right to my taste and it is a worthy watch thought it has $3300 gap in price comparing with Rolex chronograph. In short, if there is an engaging discount, I'll recommend PO 8500 or 9300.
#3
Posted 27 September 2014 - 08:07 AM
Agree, you should not be vexed. Like that I had a De Ville 8601 whose price is nearly amount to a Rolex, but I still choose it, the one I like and suit my present work and living place, and next time, I'll buy a sports Rolex. Therefore, the point is to buy your favourite and most suitable watch first, then plan to buy the one you like and you didn't have.
#8
Posted 29 September 2014 - 01:54 AM
Just depend on yourself. It's no use to emphasize the practicability of high-price watch, because the common inexpensive quartz watch is great in practicability. People who bought a high-price are undoubtly liking its fine texture and attractive look, I bought a 9300 for the design of its dial, and its new adopted movement is worth of this price.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Alexa (1)




